mikek wrote:I do always treat water, MIOX. There was a thin veil of water, although not enough for a way to get it into a bottle, but perhaps if I had one of those sheet spatulas I could have collected enough. I've been where the water source is slight, but never saw so little, I should not have given up considering the amount of water consumed by my slow party, going up slide . It's something to plan for. I even tried digging a well in the wet clay in the saddle between slide and Cornell, gave up then found a trickle at the base of Cornell. I try to keep light so my filter is a cloth. There is so much crap out there that one "could" carry. I guess you learn from every trip.
I have experience with all different types of water purification. In boy scouts we used to use chemical treatments such as iodine, bleach, & aquamira (my least preferred). For a while I hiked on my own I would boil and drink warm water which doesn't hydrate as well, but doesn't have that nasty taste of the chemical treatments. Then I was hiking with my buddy who had done AT and PCT and he showed me the pump filter. It was a no-brainer after I saw it in action. Even in extremely low-flow situations you can usually dam up water with some rocks and pool enough to pump from.
Seems you have an issue with having several items not able to complete the task of one. You have MIOX (adds sodium hypochlorite = bleach) which is advertised as treatment without a pump.....and then you carry a kerosene pump because you have issues getting the water into your receptacle. Then you have issues with large suspended solids so you filter through a cloth. Still you have issues collecting water with a low flow and are suggesting a spatula/shovel? What's the weight of all those items combined? Pump has no issues acquiring and removing contaminants from water, even in low-flowing sources. The only time I would go beyond the filter-pump is in a situation where water-borne viruses could be common, such as in the tropics (where I don't hike).
I understand the new-age "lighter is better" mantra of hiking. I can understand the novelty of some abnormal water collection/treatment techniques. It's always cool to bring out some McGuyver solution which will get inquisitive looks. However, I don't see the added benefit of piece mealing together a bunch of items which would result in an inferior method of collecting and sanitizing water. The basics of lightweight is that lightweight = less energy/mile = more miles covered = more efficient/enjoyable use of time. If going lightweight is going to compromise efficiency or reliability, then no, lightweight is not going to result in a more enjoyable or efficient use of time.
I feel the same way about stoves. I hear so many great things about alcohol stoves(Kevin =-P ). It's wonderful how lightweight they are, how nifty it is you can make one out of a can. I used one that my friend made for me for a few trips. I didn't see the point in carrying around a jug of alcohol, having terrible wind issues, and taking 2-3x as long to boil water than my iso-pro stove, and the extreme fire-hazard from spills. Sometimes novelty wears thin when you're tired, hungry, don't want to fight and just want something to eat, something to drink and a good night's rest. I'd rather pack a reliable backpacking stove, a reliable water filter, and save weight on some other areas.