Yah I'm not trying to say that if you have microspikes to throw them out. I'm just saying that if you haven't bought them I don't find them a worthwhile investment. If you've got them you probably won't need crampons. If you don't have either yet, I'm sure you will get more utility out of a pair of crampons. That's my opinion.kennykb wrote:Ask two hikers, get three opinions.
I wonder if it tilts the scales any that I already have microspikes and use them occasionally even for my daily commute? (Using crampons on an asphalt bike trail with patches of ice would, I imagine, be very bad for both the crampon and the asphalt!) I'm not planning at the moment to do anything like shinnying up the Cornell Crack when it's iced over.
Also that crampon use isn't specifically unsafe, and their use does not require the use of a rope. Not being familiar with the capabilities and use of the equipment is what is going to get you into trouble more than just making a blanket statement that use of one piece of equipment requires use of another.
Like most people will tell you in the winter to use poles. I never use poles, as I feel I burn more calories whipping them around and will fatigue faster. I know people say they save your knees, or whatever, but I'd rather be able to make it out with energy to spare, than to bonk 2 miles from the car. Only times I've ever bonked is when I've tried using poles. Sometimes the extra sturdy will help, but like 75% of the time you're just swinging around useless weight, and burning glycogen without it adding to the hike. Like mike said it's personal preference.
anyone else get visions of Mike sitting on his couch watching TV in his snowshoes?mike wrote:For me, as soon as it snows, my snowshoes go on and don't come off until Spring.